Opinion
2:17-cv-01121-APG-EJY
07-21-2023
LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID WILLIS, et al., Defendants.
Frank M. Flansburg, III., Esq. Emily A. Ellis, Esq. Maliq I. Kendricks, Esq. BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson Aaron D. Ford, Esq. Leo T. Hendges, Esq. STATE OF NEVADA Office of the Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Rashonda Smith and Douglas Thrasher
Frank M. Flansburg, III., Esq. Emily A. Ellis, Esq. Maliq I. Kendricks, Esq. BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson
Aaron D. Ford, Esq. Leo T. Hendges, Esq. STATE OF NEVADA Office of the Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Rashonda Smith and Douglas Thrasher
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record Frank M. Flansburg III, Esq., Emily A. Ellis, Esq., and Maliq I. Kendricks, Esq., of the law firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP; and Defendants Rashonda Smith and Douglas Thrasher (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record Leo T. Hendges, Esq., Deputy Attorney General, State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree, contingent on this Court's approval, as follows:
1. This stipulation is made pursuant to LR IA 6-1.
2. On July 11, 2023, Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendants' Motion”). See ECF No. 174.
3. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion is currently due on August 1, 2023.
4. On July 10, 2023, Plaintiff's counsel was informed by Deputy Attorney General Andrew Nelson that Magistrate Judge Baldwin would like to discuss a global settlement in all of Plaintiff's cases, including the above captioned case and one other case with undersigned counsel.
5. As a result, the Parties agree and respectfully request that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants' Motion be extended until fourteen (14) days after the conclusion of any unsuccessful global settlement conference or mediation.
6. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.
7. This stipulation is made in good faith and the request is not made in attempt to delay proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.