From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Williams

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Nov 10, 1972
268 So. 2d 522 (La. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 4110.

November 10, 1972.

APPEAL FROM 10TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, RICHARD B. WILLIAMS, J.

Gerard F. Thomas, Jr., Natchitoches, for defendant-appellant.

Gahagan Kelly by Russell E. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, MILLER and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.

ON MOTION TO REMAND


Plaintiff appellee Ben D. Johnson moved to remand this case so that the record could be completed. Defendant appellant Emile Williams contends that the record is complete and objects to a remand.

LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2132 provides means for the correction of the trial record after the record is lodged with the appellate court. The purpose of this article is to assure that the record on appeal is correct, irrespective of why or by whose fault it is found to be inaccurate. In all cases, the record should represent the truth.

The case is remanded so that the trial court may determine whether or not the record is complete. If it is not complete, the trial court is to order it corrected and returned to this court. If the record is complete, it is to return the record.

Remanded.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Williams

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Nov 10, 1972
268 So. 2d 522 (La. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Johnson v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Ben D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emile WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 10, 1972

Citations

268 So. 2d 522 (La. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Fields v. Walpole Tire Serv., 45

A record on appeal which is incorrect or contains misstatements, irregularities or informalities, or which…

Brown v. National Tea Co.

In all cases, the record should represent the truth. Johnson v. Williams, 268 So.2d 522 (La.App. 3rd Cir.…