Opinion
3:22-cv-00520-LRH-CLB
04-14-2023
RYLEE JOHNSON, individually; and SIOBHAN JOHNSON, individually; Plaintiffs, v. WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; KATY UPTON, individually, and in her official capacity; JASON URMSTON, individually, and in his official capacity; TAMMY HART, individually, and in her official capacity; and WENDY HAWKINS, individually, and in her official capacity; SEAN HALL, individually, and in his official capacity, DOES I-X, Defendants.
Jason J. Bach Sara K. Montalvo THORNDAL ARMSTRONG PC Katherine F. Parks
Jason J. Bach
Sara K. Montalvo
THORNDAL ARMSTRONG PC
Katherine F. Parks
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JASON URMSTON, TAMMY HART, WENDY HAWKINS, AND SEAN HALL'S MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 16] AND TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR DISTRICT DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION
(FIRST REQUEST)
LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Rylee Johnson and Siobhan Johnson (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Washoe County School District (“WCSD” or the “District”), Jason Urmston, Tammy Hart, Wendy Hawkins, Sean Hall and Katy Upton (collectively, with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule IA 6-1, that Plaintiffs shall have an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including May 8, 2023, to file their Opposition to Defendant Washoe County School District, Jason Urmston, Tammy Hart, Wendy Hawkins, and Sean Hall's (collectively referred to as “District Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 16], which was filed on April 10, 2023. The Parties also stipulate and agree pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule IA 6-1, that the District Defendants shall have an additional fourteen (14) days from the filing of Plaintiffs' Opposition, up to and including May 29, 2023, to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss.
This Stipulation is based on the following:
1. Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on February 21, 2023 [Docket No. 4].
2. On March 21, 2023, counsel for the District Defendants filed their Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 12].
3. On March 22, 2023, the Court issued an Order Granting the District Defendants Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 15] up to and including April 10, 2023.
4. On April 10, 2023, the District Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 16].
5. Also on April 10, 2023, Defendant Katy Upton filed her Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 17], Demand for Jury Trial [Docket No. 18] and Certificate of Interested Parties [Docket No. 19].
6. The current deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to the District Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is April 24, 2023, and the requested 14-day extension would make the new deadline be May 8, 2023.
7. District Defendants are also seeking a 14-day extension due to their lead counsel's maternity leave and are seeking an extension up to and including May 29, 2023, to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss.
8. These extensions are the first request and are made in good faith and is not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.