From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2015
605 F. App'x 183 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-7712

05-29-2015

ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAY VANNOY; DAVID B. FREEDMAN; TOM E. HORNE; LEIGH C. BRICKER, Defendants - Appellees.

Robert W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.


ON REHEARING UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00055-FDW) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert W. Johnson appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous. We previously dismissed this appeal as untimely. Johnson has now filed a petition for panel rehearing. Upon review of the petition, we grant panel rehearing and affirm.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Johnson's informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Johnson has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We also deny Johnson's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Johnson v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2015
605 F. App'x 183 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Johnson v. Vannoy

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAY VANNOY; DAVID B…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 29, 2015

Citations

605 F. App'x 183 (4th Cir. 2015)