From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 27, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-1648-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 27, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-1648-G (BH)

07-27-2018

GREGORY DONEL JOHNSON, ID #01779137, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN RESPONDENT, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petition for habeas corpus is successive and will be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to Henderson v. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. 2002), and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997), by separate judgment.

A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal an order transferring a successive habeas petition. See In re Garrett, 633 F. App'x 260, 261 (5th Cir. 2016); United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683 (5th Cir.2015). --------

SO ORDERED. July 27, 2018.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 27, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-1648-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Johnson v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY DONEL JOHNSON, ID #01779137, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN RESPONDENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 27, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-1648-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 27, 2018)