From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. United States

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2022
21 Civ. 6612 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 6612 (NRB) 17 Cr. 212 (NRB)

05-11-2022

ANTHONY C. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

WHEREAS the Court has reviewed petitioner's motion to compel discovery (21 Civ. 6612, ECF No. 19) and motion to compel former defense counsel to surrender petitioner's criminal case file (17 Cr. 212, ECF No. 79); and

WHEREAS these two motions have been filed in connection with petitioner's pending habeas petition; and

WHEREAS under Rule 6(a) Governing 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Proceedings, a petitioner is not entitled to conduct discovery unless a judge in the exercise of discretion and for good cause shown grants leave to do so; and

WHEREAS the Court's preliminary review of the issues raised in petitioner's habeas petition and motions to compel indicates there is no good cause for discovery as the issues raised are resolvable without discovery; it is hereby

ORDERED that the applications for discovery are denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Johnson v. United States

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2022
21 Civ. 6612 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY C. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 11, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 6612 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)