Summary
adopting Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision that Plaintiff's conclusory allegations were insufficient to support an actionable claim
Summary of this case from Johnson v. TrumpOpinion
1:23-cv-00331-NT
10-17-2023
ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants.
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Nancy Torresen United States District Judge
On August 31, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court, with copies mailed to Robert W. Johnson, his Recommended Decision after a preliminary review of the Plaintiff's Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Recommended Decision (ECF No. 5). The Plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on September 11, 2023 (ECF No. 6). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED and the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.