From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Trivit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE
May 22, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-99 (E.D. Tenn. May. 22, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:20-cv-99

05-22-2020

LASHAWN LAMONT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN E. TRIVIT, LT. RONNIE KENT, SGT. MCGINNIS, SGT. NORTON, C.O. HARRIS, C.O. TIPTON, SHERIFF DEXTER LUNGSFORD, and CARTER COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Cynthia R. Wyrick

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The Court is in receipt of a pro se prisoner's complaint for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1).

Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a prisoner who files a complaint in a district court must tender the full filing fee or he must file (1) an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees and (2) a certified copy of his inmate trust account for the previous six-month period (or institutional equivalent). 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff has not paid the required $400.00 filing fee, nor has be submitted the proper documents to proceed in forma pauperis. Specifically, Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a preprinted form application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee.

Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of entry of this order to pay the full filing fee or to submit the necessary documents. Plaintiff is hereby NOTIFIED that if he fails to fully timely comply with this order, the Court shall presume that Plaintiff is not a pauper, shall assess the full amount of fees, and shall order the case dismissed for want of prosecution.

Further, Plaintiff is NOTIFIED that the Court WILL NOT consider any amendments and/or supplements to the complaint or any other kind of motion for relief until after the Court has screened the complaint pursuant to the Prison Reform Litigation Act, see, e.g., 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A, which the Court will do as soon as practicable. Accordingly, the Court will automatically deny any requests to amend or supplement the complaint and/or motions filed before the Court has completed this screening.

Plaintiff is ORDERED to immediately inform the Court and Defendants of any address changes in writing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.13, it is the duty of a pro se party to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.13. Failure to provide a correct address to this Court within fourteen days of any change in address may result in the dismissal of this action.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Travis R. McDonough

TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Trivit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE
May 22, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-99 (E.D. Tenn. May. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Johnson v. Trivit

Case Details

Full title:LASHAWN LAMONT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN E. TRIVIT, LT. RONNIE KENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE

Date published: May 22, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:20-cv-99 (E.D. Tenn. May. 22, 2020)