From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 15, 2016
NO. 2:15-cv-01284-JAK-MRW (C.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 2:15-cv-01284-JAK-MRW

12-15-2016

JOCELYN ANNETTE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., B.A.R., PENSKE TOYOTA, CARSON TOYOTA, NORWALK TOYOTA, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The Court, having heard the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.'s ("TMS") and Apaulo, Inc. dba Norwalk Toyota's (collectively, "Defendants") against plaintiff Jocelyn Annette Johnson on June 27, 2016, and thereafter granting the motion in its entirety: ///

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: That plaintiff Jocelyn Annette Johnson shall take nothing and that Defendants are entitled to judgment against plaintiff Jocelyn Annette Johnson. Furthermore, by reason of said judgment and pursuant to Rule 54(d)(1) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules 54-1 and 54-2, Defendants may seek to recover costs pursuant to an application submitted under those rules. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2016

/s/_________

HON. JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 15, 2016
NO. 2:15-cv-01284-JAK-MRW (C.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOCELYN ANNETTE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 15, 2016

Citations

NO. 2:15-cv-01284-JAK-MRW (C.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2016)