From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Townsend

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2277 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2277.

November 3, 2005


MEMORANDUM


Presently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63).

Magistrate Judge Blewitt recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 22), as well as Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw his Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 62). No objections were filed.

The failure to file objections permits the Court to review the Report and Recommendation for clear error and manifest injustice and then adopt without a formal opinion. Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Dominick D'Andrea, Inc., 150 F.3d 245, 250 (3d Cir. 1998) ("[T]he district judge need take no time reviewing the matter unless a party objects to the order.").

NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2005, upon review of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63) is ADOPTED
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 22) is DENIED.
(3) Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw his Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 62) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Townsend

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2277 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2005)
Case details for

Johnson v. Townsend

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. BENJAMIN TOWNSEND, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 3, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2277 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2005)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. CO 1 Lasko

Indeed, it is questionable whether the Court could appropriately interfere in the DOC's broad discretion in…