From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Tang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2012
2:11-cv-03412-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-03412-GEB-GGH

03-28-2012

Scott N. Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Helen T. Tang, Individually and d/b/a One-Stop Pharmacy; Nathan H. Tang, Defendants.


ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE

Plaintiff's Status Report filed March 26, 2012, reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on April 9, 2012, is continued to June 25, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference.

Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 4(m)") that failure to serve Defendants with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may result in this action being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before April 23, 2012, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for each defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Tang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2012
2:11-cv-03412-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Tang

Case Details

Full title:Scott N. Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Helen T. Tang, Individually and d/b/a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 28, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-03412-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)