From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1568 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1568 KJM DAD P

08-23-2011

DAVID WAYNE JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 22, 2011, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations, recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss be denied. While the findings and recommendations were pending, petitioner filed a motion requesting that the assigned district judge rule on those findings and recommendations. On August 12, 2011, the assigned district judge adopted the findings and recommendations in full and ordered respondent to file an answer to petitioner's amended petition within sixty days, thereby rendering petitioner's motion for a ruling moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for a ruling on the findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 18) is denied as moot.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1568 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WAYNE JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1568 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)