From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Superintendent Maldonaldo

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jan 31, 2007
05-CV-859S (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2007)

Opinion

05-CV-859S.

January 31, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a second Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Docket No. 8.) Under the standards promulgated in Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997) and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60-62 (2d Cir. 1986), this Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice at this time.

Plaintiff filed the present Motion to Appoint Counsel just 11 days after this Court denied his first motion. (See Docket No. 7.)

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Docket No. 8) is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Superintendent Maldonaldo

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jan 31, 2007
05-CV-859S (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Superintendent Maldonaldo

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP T. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MALDONALDO, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Jan 31, 2007

Citations

05-CV-859S (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2007)