From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Stewart

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 10, 2021
20-cv-06801-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-06801-JST

08-10-2021

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT M. STEWART, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

JON S. TIGAR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On July 13, 2021, the Court ordered the parties to file a notice of settlement, notice of need for mediation, or “joint status report explaining why they cannot do so, by July 27, 2021.” ECF No. 24. Nothing was filed. On July 30, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff Scott Johnson “to show cause in writing by August 6, 2021, as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute” and explained that “[f]ailure to file a timely response to this order to show cause will result in dismissal of this case with prejudice.” ECF No. 25.

Johnson did not file a response to the order to show cause. Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Stewart

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 10, 2021
20-cv-06801-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT M. STEWART, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 10, 2021

Citations

20-cv-06801-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2021)