Opinion
Nos. 14-03-00555-CR, 14-03-00556-CR, 14-03-00557-CR.
Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).
On Appeal from the 182nd District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 916,099, 916,100, 916,110. Affirmed.
Panel consists of Justices YATES, ANDERSON, and HUDSON.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offenses of aggravated sexual assault, aggravated kidnaping, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. On April 21, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty years for the aggravated assault, life for aggravated kidnaping, and life for aggravated sexual assault. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.