From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 10, 2003
No. 05-02-01229-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 10, 2003)

Opinion

No. 05-02-01229-CR

Opinion Filed December 10, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court. Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F01-56049-Ht.

Before Justices WHITTINGTON, JAMES, and O'NEILL.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Edward Charles Johnson appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. A jury convicted appellant of the crime and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 10, 2003
No. 05-02-01229-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 10, 2003)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD CHARLES JOHNSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Dec 10, 2003

Citations

No. 05-02-01229-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 10, 2003)