Opinion
No. 05-02-01229-CR
Opinion Filed December 10, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court. Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F01-56049-Ht.
Before Justices WHITTINGTON, JAMES, and O'NEILL.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Edward Charles Johnson appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. A jury convicted appellant of the crime and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.