From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 10, 2015
No. 05-14-00713-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00713-CR No. 05-14-00714-CR No. 05-14-00715-CR

04-10-2015

MICHAEL DAN ALLEN JOHNSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 366-81546-2013, 366-81547-2013, 366-81548-2013

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On January 20, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant's brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeals; (2) appellant is indigent; (3) Brock Duke was originally appointed to represent appellant, but later William Schultz was appointed as appellant's counsel; (4) the change in counsel was not sent to this Court, nor did Mr. Schultz receive notices from this Court or copies of the record; (5) Hannah Stroud has now been appointed to represent appellant; and (6) Ms. Stroud indicated she would need about forty-five days to prepare appellant's brief.

We DIRECT the Clerk to list Hannah Stroud as appellant's attorney of record in place of Brock Duke.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FORTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 10, 2015
No. 05-14-00713-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAN ALLEN JOHNSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Apr 10, 2015

Citations

No. 05-14-00713-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2015)