From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78396

June 26, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY HONORABLE LARRY L. KENDRICK.

Mary S. Choi, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



ORDER


Appellant, Jerriishant Johnson (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. This court previously affirmed Movant's conviction of one count of assault in the first degree in violation of section 565.050, RSMo 2000 and one count of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 2000 on direct appeal. State v. Johnson, 997 S.W.2d 537 (Mo.App.E.D. 1999). In this appeal, Movant argues the motion court clearly erred because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present evidence supporting his claim of self-defense.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JERRIISHANT JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

48 S.W.3d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)