From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jul 22, 2003
110 S.W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81544

July 22, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau; William L. Syler, Judge.

Prior Report: 53 S.W.3d 210.

Mary S. Choi, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Anne E. Edgington, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.



ORDER


Anthony Johnson appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jul 22, 2003
110 S.W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY D. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jul 22, 2003

Citations

110 S.W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)