DECIDED JUNE 13, 2011. RECONSIDERATION DENIED JULY 11, 2011. Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 301 Ga. App. 423. Garner Wald, Michael E. Garner, Stephanie N. Wald, for appellant.
This evidence authorized the trial court to find that counsel's representation of Miller in connection with the offered plea bargain was not deficient. Moreover, nothing in the record showed that Miller was amenable to the state's plea bargain offer, as required for Miller to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by counsel's representation. See Lloyd v. State, 258 Ga. 645, 647-648 (2) (a) ( 373 SE2d 1) (1988) (to show deficient performance, appellant must show that counsel's representation fell below objective standard of reasonableness; in the context of an offered plea bargain, objective professional standards dictate that a defendant be told that an offer to plead guilty has been made and to be advised of the consequences of the choices confronting him); Johnson v. State, 301 Ga. App. 423, 424 ( 687 SE2d 663) (2009) (same). See Cleveland v. State, 285 Ga. 142, 145-146 ( 674 SE2d 289) (2009).
(Punctuation omitted.) Johnson v. State, 301 Ga. App. 423, 426 ( 687 SE2d 663) (2009). (Citation and punctuation omitted.)
Accordingly, the trial court's conclusion that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the nurse's testimony or to move for a mistrial therefor, which was implicit in the trial court's denial of the motion for new trial, is not clearly erroneous.Johnson v. State, 301 Ga.App. 423, 424–426, 687 S.E.2d 663 (2009).2. Granger claims that a comment made by the prosecutor during closing argument about the defense attorney's tactics was prejudicial and that his counsel was ineffective in failing to object thereto, such that he is entitled to a new trial.
289 Ga. 532, 712 S.E.2d 811 (2011). FN2. Johnson v. State, 301 Ga.App. 423, 687 S.E.2d 663 (2009). and adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court as our own.