From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 4, 1979
259 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

58176.

SUBMITTED JULY 12, 1979.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979.

Armed robbery; aggravated assault. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Fleming.

Payne F. Johnson, Jr., pro se. Richard E. Allen, District Attorney, for appellee.


Johnson was found guilty in the Superior Court of Richmond County of the offenses of armed robbery and aggravated assault. He filed an appeal pro se, contending he was denied his constitutional right to appeal because the trial court refused to appoint counsel to represent him on appeal, knowing he was indigent.

There is nothing in the record to support Johnson's contention that he requested counsel, or that the court refused to appoint counsel to represent him on this appeal. Treating the document he filed in this court June 25, 1979 as an enumeration of error and brief, the only document in the record to support his contention is the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis he filed in the Superior Court of Richmond County on April 5, 1979. However, that was a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d), which applies only to proceedings in federal courts, and has no application to this appeal. Neither is there anything in the record to support Johnson's contention that his counsel at trial requested the court to appoint another attorney to represent Johnson on appeal. "The burden is on the party alleging error to show it affirmatively by the record." Shepherd v. Shepherd, 225 Ga. 455, 457 ( 169 S.E.2d 314) (1969); Maloy v. Dixon, 127 Ga. App. 151, 153 ( 193 S.E.2d 19) (1972). Accordingly, the enumeration of error is without merit.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.


SUBMITTED JULY 12, 1979 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 4, 1979
259 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 4, 1979

Citations

259 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
259 S.E.2d 161

Citing Cases

Lay v. McElven

Our exhaustive search of jurisprudence nationwide, however, reveals at least three states, Georgia, New…

Archuleta v. Goldman

At least one jurisdiction has expressly held that Section 1915(d) applies only to proceedings in federal…