From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 23, 2001
36 S.W.3d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77910

January 23, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE MARK D. SEIGEL.

Gwenda R. Robinson; Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Attorney General, Stephanie Morrell; Assistant Attorney General Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before: Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



ORDER


Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 23, 2001
36 S.W.3d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 23, 2001

Citations

36 S.W.3d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Rowley

Petitioner then filed a motion for post-conviction relief in the Circuit Court, the denial of which was…