From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District
Jun 21, 1977
553 S.W.2d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 38252.

June 21, 1977.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, RICHARD T. ENRIGHT, J.

William J. Shaw, Public Defender, Richard L. Rodemyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clayton, for movant-appellant.

John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Movant's Rule 27.26 motion was denied by the trial court without an evidentiary hearing and he has appealed.

Movant had been found guilty of possessing heroin and sentenced to five years' imprisonment. We affirmed the conviction in State v. Johnson, 529 S.W.2d 658 (Mo.App. 1975). Thereafter movant filed his "post-conviction motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence."

We limit our review to deciding whether the trial court's order is clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j).

The only ground in movant's motion challenges the original search and seizure of his briefcase. In McCrary v. State, 529 S.W.2d 467 (Mo.App. 1975) we ruled that "a claim of illegal search is not cognizable in 27.26 proceedings." Further, this point was adjudicated on appeal and cannot be reconsidered in a post-conviction proceeding. Cochran v. State, 545 S.W.2d 710 (Mo.App. 1975).

The state's motion to retax costs is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

DOWD and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District
Jun 21, 1977
553 S.W.2d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. JOHNSON, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District

Date published: Jun 21, 1977

Citations

553 S.W.2d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. State

Aikens v. State, 549 S.W.2d 117 (Mo.App. 1977). Furthermore, this matter was considered by us in direct…