From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 10, 1993
613 So. 2d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-01601.

February 10, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Susan C. Bucklew, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anne Y. Swing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Frederick Johnson appeals his conviction and sentence as a habitual violent felony offender. We find merit in only one of the points raised. Johnson correctly contends that reliance on a prior conviction to support a finding of habitual offender status is reversible error when the prior conviction is being appealed at the time of sentencing. Delguidice v. State, 554 So.2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Coleman v. State, 281 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). A review of the record reveals the trial court erred in determining Johnson's status as a violent felony offender relying on robbery and kidnapping convictions which were on appeal. See Johnson v. State, 579 So.2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 10, 1993
613 So. 2d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK JOHNSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 10, 1993

Citations

613 So. 2d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Breeze v. State

Although that conviction was eventually affirmed, it is clear that that conviction could not be used to…

Baxter v. State

The trial court denied the motion on the grounds argued by the state, attaching the plea agreement and the…