From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 13, 2010
32 So. 3d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 1D09-5449.

April 13, 2010.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Richard Albritton, Judge.

Bruce Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant filed a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 arguing that his counsel was ineffective for permitting him to plead to driving while license suspended or revoked because he had previously been designated as a habitual traffic offender pursuant to section 322.264(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), and thus could not be convicted of violating section 322.34(2), Florida Statutes (2006). Section 322.34(2) expressly states that it does not apply to those who have been designated "habitual traffic offenders," as defined in section 322.264. The trial court denied the motion without attaching record portions that would refute the appellant's claim.

Because the appellant's claim is facially sufficient, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant's claim that he cannot be convicted under section 322.34(2) where he has previously been designated as a habitual traffic offender, or, in the alternative, to hold an evidentiary hearing at which the appellant may prove his claim.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WEBSTER, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 13, 2010
32 So. 3d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bruce JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 13, 2010

Citations

32 So. 3d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)