From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 20, 2000
773 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D00-1347.

Opinion filed December 20, 2000.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Lawrence A. Schwartz, Judge, Lower Tribunal Nos. 90-48594, 91-15924.

Affirmed.

Nathan Lamont Johnson, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Frank J. Ingrassia, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before Jorgenson, Gersten, and Shevin, JJ.


See Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that defendant abuses the judicial process by filing successive motions "that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions"; and warning defendant that "a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal in any court is subject to having his or her gain time forfeited.").


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 20, 2000
773 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN LAMONT JOHNSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 20, 2000

Citations

773 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)