From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 24, 2021
330 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2773

11-24-2021

Pablo J. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Pablo J. Johnson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Pablo J. Johnson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

B.L. Thomas, Makar, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 24, 2021
330 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Pablo J. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

330 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)