From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Jun 2, 2020
603 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107962

06-02-2020

Carlos JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.


Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Carlos Johnson (Appellant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. Crim. P. (2017), unless otherwise noted.
--------


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Jun 2, 2020
603 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carlos JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Jun 2, 2020

Citations

603 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Custom Constr. Sols. v. B & P Constr.

"The essential elements of unjust enrichment are '(1) the defendant was enriched by the receipt of a benefit;…