From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Starbucks Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 9, 2021
2:18-cv-02460-KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-02460-KJM-KJN

08-09-2021

Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Starbucks Corporation, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On May 26, 2021, the parties stipulated to the dismissal of this action without prejudice, and this court dismissed the action without prejudice by minute order on June 1, 2021. See Stip., ECF No. 30; Min. Order, ECF No. 31. On June 17, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice, ECF No. 32, which the court construes as an unopposed motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). The motion so construed is granted. This action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Starbucks Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 9, 2021
2:18-cv-02460-KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. Starbucks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Starbucks Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 9, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-02460-KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)