From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Smith

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2023
1:21CV13 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2023)

Opinion

1:21CV13

03-14-2023

KENNETH JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER. J. SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORETTA C. BIGGS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on January 31, 2023, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 26, 27.) Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, to which Officer Smith responded. (See ECF Nos. 28, 29).

The Court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that “Defendant Officer J. Smith's Motion for Summary Judgment as to All Claims”, (ECF No. 20), is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiff's medical deliberate indifference claim is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and summary judgment is entered in favor of Officer Smith on Plaintiff's remaining claims.

A Judgment will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Smith

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2023
1:21CV13 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER. J. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 14, 2023

Citations

1:21CV13 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2023)