From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Slave-Noose

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 20, 2023
3:22-cv-290-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-290-CSD

10-20-2023

LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SLAVE-NOOSE, et al., Defendants.

LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Plaintiff SAMUEL L. PEZONE JR. Bar No. 15978 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants


LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Plaintiff

SAMUEL L. PEZONE JR. Bar No. 15978 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Lausteveion Johnson, in pro se, and all Defendants named in this case, by through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and Andrew C. Nelson, Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate that above-captioned matter should be dismissed with prejudice by order of this Court, with each party to bear their own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Slave-Noose

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 20, 2023
3:22-cv-290-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. Slave-Noose

Case Details

Full title:LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SLAVE-NOOSE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-290-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)