From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Skil Tech Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 23, 2017
Civil No. 17-403 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 23, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 17-403 (JRT/FLN)

06-23-2017

CLARENCE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SKIL TECH INC, et al, Defendants.

Clarence Johnson, 7100 Columbus Avenue, Richfield, MN 55423, pro se plaintiff.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Clarence Johnson, 7100 Columbus Avenue, Richfield, MN 55423, pro se plaintiff.

Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated June 6, 2017, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for failure to allege any basis for this court's jurisdiction, and for failure to state a claim.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: June 23, 2017
at Minneapolis, Minnesota.

s/John R. Tunheim

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Johnson v. Skil Tech Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 23, 2017
Civil No. 17-403 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Johnson v. Skil Tech Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SKIL TECH INC, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 23, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 17-403 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 23, 2017)