From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 28, 2007
No. CIV S-06-2035 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2035 FCD KJM P.

December 28, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's December 12, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 28, 2007
No. CIV S-06-2035 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 28, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2035 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2007)