From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 5, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-392-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-392-JAM-EFB PS

09-05-2012

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SARABJIT KAUR SINGH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISPOSITION

Pursuant to the representations of counsel for plaintiff, the court has determined that the above-captioned case has settled.

The court now orders that dispositional documents are to be filed not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

All hearing dates set in this matter, including the Status Conference currently set for September 19, 2012, are VACATED.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 5, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-392-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SARABJIT KAUR SINGH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 5, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-392-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2012)