Opinion
Case No.2:11-cv-01511-WBS-CKD
08-17-2011
Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff, v. Sukh Singh, Individually and as Trustee of the Sukh C. Singh Family Trust, dated July 20, 2006 and d/b/a Tokay Shell Autocare; Perminder Singh, Individually and as Trustee of the Sukh C. Family Trust, dated July 20, 2006 and d/b/a Tokay Shell Autocare, Defendants
S. Dean Ruiz, Attorney for Defendants Sukh Singh Perminder Singh Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL
SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 FOR
DEFENDANT(s) SUKH SINGH AND
PERMINDER SINGH TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson and Defendants, Sukh Singh and Perminder Singh, by and through their respective attorneys of record, Scott N. Johnson; S. Dean Ruiz, stipulate as follows:
1. No extension of time has been previously obtained.
2. Defendants Sukh Singh and Perminder Singh are granted an extension until September 6, 2011 to respond or otherwise plead reference to Plaintiff's complaint.
3. Defendants Sukh Singh and Perminder Singh's response will be due no later than September 6, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of August 16, 2011
S. Dean Ruiz,
Attorney for Defendants
Sukh Singh
Perminder Singh
Scott N. Johnson,
Attorney for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendants Sukh Singh and Perminder Singh shall have until September 6, 2011 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint.
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE