From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 31, 2022
No. CV-18-00889-PHX-MTL (D. Ariz. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

CV-18-00889-PHX-MTL

03-31-2022

Ruben Myran Johnson, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.


ORDER DEATH PENALTY CASE

Michael T. Liburdi United States Dislria Judge

Before the Court is Petitioner's Motion to Stay and Abey, filed pro se. (Doc. 58.)

Petitioner is represented by counsel. (See Doc. 6.) Counsel has exclusive authority to act on Petitioner's behalf unless and until there is an order allowing counsel to withdraw. See LRCiv. 83.3(c)(2) (“Whenever a party has appeared by an attorney, that party cannot thereafter appear or act in that party's own behalf in the cause, or take any steps therein, unless an order of substitution shall first have been made by the Court after notice to the attorney of each such party, and to the opposite party.”).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED striking Petitioner's pro se Motion to Stay and Abey. (Doc. 58.)


Summaries of

Johnson v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 31, 2022
No. CV-18-00889-PHX-MTL (D. Ariz. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:Ruben Myran Johnson, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

No. CV-18-00889-PHX-MTL (D. Ariz. Mar. 31, 2022)