From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Shinde

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 6, 2022
22-cv-01098-VC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-01098-VC

07-06-2022

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. KIRANKUMAR SHINDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING UNRUH ACT CLAIM RE: DKT. NO. 16

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. See Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F. 4th 1202, 1211-14 (9th Cir. 2021). The case is in its early stages, so concerns of judicial economy, convenience, fairness to litigants, and comity do not favor retaining jurisdiction. See id. at 1214. And the facts of the case-“a frequent filer of ADA and Unruh Act claims seeking federal jurisdiction to circumvent California's procedural barriers to such suits-present the type of exceptional circumstances contemplated by section 1367(c)(4)” to decline supplemental jurisdiction. Whitaker v. Alice & Olivia California Holdings LLC, 2022 WL 1135088, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2022).

A status report is due October 3, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Shinde

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 6, 2022
22-cv-01098-VC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Shinde

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. KIRANKUMAR SHINDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 6, 2022

Citations

22-cv-01098-VC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2022)