From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Sheldon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2015
Case No. 3:14 CV 1675 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14 CV 1675

06-11-2015

Henry O. Johnson, Jr., Petitioner, v. Ed Sheldon, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed April 20, 2015 (Doc. 7). The R&R recommends this Court grant Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6).

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Petitioner's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court dismisses the Petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jack Zouhary

JACK ZOUHARY

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

June 11, 2015


Summaries of

Johnson v. Sheldon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2015
Case No. 3:14 CV 1675 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Johnson v. Sheldon

Case Details

Full title:Henry O. Johnson, Jr., Petitioner, v. Ed Sheldon, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14 CV 1675 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2015)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst.

"'Notice' pleading is insufficient in the habeas context, as the petitioner is expected to state facts that…

Taylor v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst.

"'Notice' pleading is insufficient in the habeas context, as the petitioner is expected to state facts that…