Opinion
No. 18-55051
03-19-2019
PERRY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SELENE FINANCE, LP; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 8:16-cv-01085-AG-KES MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Perry Johnson appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failing to comply with court orders, In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. Liab. Litig., 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Johnson's action because Johnson failed to comply with the district court's scheduling orders and the relevant factors favored dismissal. See id. at 1226-29 (discussing the five factors a district court must weigh in deciding whether to dismiss a case for failure to comply with a court order); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992) (although preferred, the district court is not required to make explicit findings; this court may review the record independently to determine if the district court has abused its discretion).
AFFIRMED.