From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Sci-Huntingdon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
May 11, 2017
Civil Action No. 17-50 (W.D. Pa. May. 11, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 17-50

05-11-2017

CHARLES JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SCI-HUNTINGDON, Defendant.


ORDER ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, and the balance of record, HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 3].

(2) This case is DISMISSED due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute.

(3) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 11th day of May, 2017.

/s/_________

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Sci-Huntingdon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
May 11, 2017
Civil Action No. 17-50 (W.D. Pa. May. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Johnson v. Sci-Huntingdon

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SCI-HUNTINGDON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE

Date published: May 11, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 17-50 (W.D. Pa. May. 11, 2017)