From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 18, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-1296 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-1296

11-18-2020

ADRIENNE M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33, 1381-1383, filed by the Plaintiff, Adrienne Johnson, were denied by the October 23, 2018 decision of Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") J. Dell Gordon. Ms. Johnson appeals from that decision and contends that the ALJ's unfavorable decision was reached in error. (ECF No. 13 at 4-7.) Ms. Johnson's sole argument is that ALJ Gordon's appointment was improper under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Id.

Ms. Johnson claims that she is disabled due to multiple severe medical impairments, including diabetes with neuropathy; cholecystitis; gastroparesis; colitis; hypertension; hypertriglyceridemia; obesity; iritis; headaches; and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. (ECF No. 13 at 2)(citations to Adm. Record omitted).

In response, the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") concedes that further development of the record and re-evaluation of Ms. Johnson's claim of disability is warranted, and he requests remand of this case. (ECF No. 14.) The Commissioner represents that Ms. Johnson's counsel consents to his request for remand. Id. at 2. Because the parties agree that the ALJ erred in the evaluation of Ms. Johnson's disability claim, her request for review is granted, the final decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Commissioner, through the Appeals Council, will refer Ms. Johnson's case to a different Administrative Law Judge to further evaluate Ms. Johnson's claims, offer Ms. Johnson the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a new decision.

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings in this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), including entry of final judgment. See ECF No. 3, ¶ 2 (referring to United States General Consent Form); ECF No. 7. --------

An appropriate Order follows.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 18, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-1296 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Johnson v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ADRIENNE M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 18, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-1296 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2020)