From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 27, 2012
3:11-cv-0 04 87-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-0 04 87-HDM-VPC

11-27-2012

DAVID JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order granting defendants a one-week extension of time in which to file a motion for summary judgment (#70) are hereby DENIED. The magistrate judge's order (#63) was not clearly erroneous or contrary to the law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 27, 2012
3:11-cv-0 04 87-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Sandoval

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-0 04 87-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 27, 2012)