From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Sanchez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 17, 2023
22-cv-07858-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07858-JSW

01-17-2023

PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SANCHEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ECF NO. 6

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. He has not obtained, nor requested, leave to file such a motion, as required by Local Rule 7-9. Secondly, Plaintiff's challenges to the order of dismissal satisfy none of the grounds for reconsideration enumerated in Rule 60(b). His disagreement with the Court's analysis and conclusion can be raised on appeal but does not present a basis for reconsideration under Rule 60. See Twentieth Century - Fox Film Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338, 1341 (9th Cir. 1981).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Sanchez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 17, 2023
22-cv-07858-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SANCHEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 17, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07858-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)