From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS

09-20-2011

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S & K PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.


ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The answer filed on July 1, 2011 on behalf of the defendant partnership was signed by one of the partners, proceeding pro se. On August 8, 2011, defendant was granted thirty days leave to obtain counsel and cautioned that failure to do so would result in striking of the answer. Defendant has failed to obtain counsel.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The answer filed July 1, 2011 on behalf of defendant S&K Partnership, dkt. no. 7, is stricken. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter default against defendant S&K Partnership.

2. Within sixty days, plaintiff shall move for default judgment and shall serve a copy of the motion on defendant.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S & K PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)