From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS

01-04-2012

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S & K PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). By order filed November 7, 2011, plaintiff was directed, within thirty days, to file proof of service of summons demonstrating compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (h) or to file a voluntary dismissal of the action. That time period has now expired and plaintiff has neither filed proof of service of summons nor a voluntary dismissal.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, within fifteen days, why this action should not be dismissed.

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S & K PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)