From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2010
No. CIV S-04-776 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-776 LKK EFB P.

November 22, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On September 13, 2010, defendants filed a request for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order filed August 30, 2010, granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to state an equal protection claim. Dckt. No. 180. Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge filed August 30, 2010, is affirmed.

DATED: November 22, 2010.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2010
No. CIV S-04-776 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-04-776 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)