From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2007
2:05-cv-2123-GEB-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2007)

Opinion

2:05-cv-2123-GEB-EFB-P.

August 10, 2007


ORDER


On June 4, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed May 23, 2007, staying discovery as to defendants Jackson, Miranda and Wagner, pending resolution of their motion to dismiss. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed May 23, 2007, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2007
2:05-cv-2123-GEB-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:BYRON JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 10, 2007

Citations

2:05-cv-2123-GEB-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2007)