From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 16, 2010
No. 2: 04-cv-0253 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2: 04-cv-0253 LKK KJN P.

July 16, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 29, 2010, petitioner was ordered to inform the court whether he intended to raise in the amended petition the exhausted prosecutorial misconduct claim based on the prosecutor's dismissal of an African American juror, raised in the original petition. On July 12, 2010, petitioner filed a declaration stating that he intended to raise this claim.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-eight days of the date of this order, respondent shall file a supplemental response addressing petitioner's prosecutorial misconduct claim discussed above; petitioner may file a reply to respondent's response within twenty-eight days thereafter.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 16, 2010
No. 2: 04-cv-0253 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 16, 2010

Citations

No. 2: 04-cv-0253 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2010)