From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Roche

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 17, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P.

September 17, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 31, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Roche

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 17, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Roche

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S.M. ROCHE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 17, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2007)