From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Roche

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 5, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P.

December 5, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. On November 9, 2007 defendants filed a motion to compel, alleging that plaintiff had not responded adequately to their requests for production of documents and interrogatories. On November 21, 2007, plaintiff filed copies of a number of documents, plus answers to interrogatories, which were served on counsel for the defendants. Because it appears that plaintiff has responded, the motion is moot nor do sanctions seem warranted. If defendants deem these responses inadequate, they may file a further motion to compel within fifteen days of the date of this order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' November 9, 2007 motion to compel is denied without prejudice; any renewed motion should be filed within fifteen days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Roche

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 5, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Roche

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S.M. ROCHE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 5, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1676 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2007)